Water is the source of
life. Without it, we cannot survive. Some have lived without water for
forty-eight hours, others eight days, but they all surely die. While water is
not an unlimited resource, the largest factor involved in water scarcity is
contamination. The film Flow discusses water contamination in full. It also
discusses the privatization of water, those benefiting from that
privatization, and the effects it has on developing nations.
In the United States, our water is contaminated by a
number of sources. These range from the cosmetics we use on our faces, hair,
and body to the medications we take. A large number of fish off the coast of
Texas were found to have Prozac in their bloodstreams. It has also been noted
that many birth control pills cause fish to change sex leading to the depletion
of fish populations in certain areas. The contaminants are flushed through
sewage systems, “purified,” and pumped into oceans. As was taught in elementary
school science classes, water goes through a cycle which includes evaporation
and precipitation. Therefore, it can be determined that this contaminated water
often falls upon our soil.
Cosmetics are not the only issue involved in water
contamination. Corporations are the largest culprits. These include both
agricultural corporations and other such factories. In the agricultural
industry, a large amount of water is used. This water is used to grow crops,
but is also used as drinking water for animals. While a large majority of clean
water is being used to sustain animals on industrial agriculture farms, pure
water sources are also being contaminated by this same industry. This is caused
by runoff of fecal contamination that destroys estuaries, as well as
slaughterhouse remnants run off. While this happens a lot in the U.S., it also
happens in other countries, such as Bolivia.
In Flow, the privatization of water in Bolivia is
discussed, as well as that in Africa. The Bolivian people protested the
privatization of water, but their government did not heed their retort, as they
were directed by the World Bank to allow it. The poorest persons in this nation
were then unable to purchase water due to a lack of funds. They were unable to
pay for the thing necessary for sustaining life. They were enraged, because
water had always been free.
Large companies claim that the privatization of water ensures
clean water for developing nations. However, they fail to mention that they are
completely unwilling to give this resource for free. They want to make money
from their investments. In Africa, specifically, many large water corporations
have set up wells of clean water. Persons must pay to gather water from these
sources. South Africans in poor, rural areas are advised not to drink water
from streams, and are asked to pay for water from these sources. However, they
do not have a choice. If you do not have money, paying for clean water is not
an option. You are forced to drink the contaminated water, even if it is the
source of your mother’s death.
Large companies make themselves seem like philanthropists
who are providing a solution to the problem of water scarcity. However, they are
not making the providing a solution at all. They do not view clean water as a
necessity, but a commodity. It is advertised to the poorest of the poor and
implemented in their communities. But having access to purchasable clean water
does not change a person’s financial circumstances or their ability to receive
clean water.
Other persons have created more viable options for the
poor. One Indian man implemented a UV water purifying system that offered clean
water to villagers for just two American dollars a year per person. There are
viable alternatives. But these cannot be implemented until large corporations
relinquish control and begin believing that every person, regardless of
economic capability, has a right to clean water.